Skip to content
The Dune

Last updated 2026-07-27

Pre-feasibility and stakeholder preparation.

The Dune is currently an independently initiated concept. It has early illustrations, a working programme and an initial location hypothesis. It does not yet have confirmed land control, municipal approval, an appointed architect or a completed feasibility study.

The direct answers.

Is the site purchased or optioned?
No. There is no land agreement of any kind.
Has the landowner approved the concept?
No. Landowner dialogue has not been concluded.
Does Klepp municipality support the development?
No. No planning dialogue has been opened, and no authority has expressed a position.
Is zoning in place?
No. The land-use position is unverified.
Has an architect been appointed?
No. No architect, engineer or operator has been engaged for this project.
Will the building match the illustrations?
No. The images express an architectural direction and are not a design proposal.
Do the coordinates confirm a building footprint?
No. 58.801930, 5.552718 is a study point used to test orientation.
Is financing in place?
No. The project is not financed, and no investment offer is being made.

Material changes.

  1. First public version of the project website published, including the status system, source register and document library structure.
  2. Concept illustrations produced with AI assistance against a fixed orientation description. Recorded as project material, not as evidence or design.
  3. Initial source register compiled from official planning, protection and tourism sources, with access dates recorded.
  4. Study coordinate 58.801930, 5.552718 adopted as a working orientation hypothesis, approximately 355 metres from the official Borestranda Scenic Route coordinate.
  5. Working project name, programme ambition of approximately 100 rooms and the Arrival / Heart / Dune Roof structure established.

The next decision gate.

Gate 1, land and first planning dialogue. It requires:

  • Identification of relevant parcels and registered owners
  • An initial, non-binding landowner conversation
  • A first structured meeting with the municipality about the study area
  • A decision on whether to fund a site fatal-flaw analysis

Accuracy promise.

When a project assumption changes, this website will update the status and retain a record of material changes.

If a study contradicts a claim made here, the claim will be corrected rather than quietly removed, and the change will appear in the list above.

Everything above is what the project can currently stand behind.